Writing a high-impact science manuscript is essential for scientists who want to communicate their research findings effectively to the wider scientific community. A well-written manuscript not only provides a clear description of the research methodology and results but also presents a compelling argument for the significance of the research. In this article, we provide some guidelines on how to write a high-impact science manuscript that will attract the interest of journal editors and reviewers.

1. Select the journal that best fits your research to help guide the structure of your manuscript.
2. Create your figures early on to help you focus on the findings.
3. Write a draft of your cover letter and/or Abstract to distill the Whys and Whats of your research.
4. Write your Methods while performing the experiments.
5. Write your Results in the order of your Methods.
6. Keep it simple.
7. Keep your Discussion focused. Your research is a broad and interesting topic, but the Discussion should be focused on this specific study.
8. Have a colleague familiar with your research read your manuscript before finalizing it.
9. Ask a friend who is not in your field read the manuscript to ensure its readability.
10. Consider hiring a professional science editor to help you clearly communicate your science.

WHAT IS A PREPOSITION?

According to the Merriam-Webster Learners Dictionary, a preposition is: “a word or group of words that is used with a noun, pronoun, or noun phrase to show direction, location, or time, or to introduce an object”.

The number and quality of citations of your papers is increasingly being used as an index for promotions, grant review and funding, and tenure. Although this practice is somewhat controversial, having your work cited remains an important aspect of a scientist’s career. Consider these 5 simple tips below to increase the number of your citations and stand out among your peers.

Here are 5 things to consider while formatting your manuscrip.

The Take-Home message is the one, most critical piece of information that you want the reader to retain after reading your paper. The Take-Home message is what discriminates your paper from all of the others.

Which is correct – ‘biologic’ or ‘biological’, ‘histologic’ or ‘histological’, ‘physiologic’ or ‘physiological’? Is there a difference or can these words be used interchangeably?

Opinions regarding the use of the –ic and –ical word endings are varied and conflicting, and this issue has been hotly debated in linguistics and lexicology (Kaunisto, 2007). In 1969, the linguist Hans Marchand promoted the use of the shorter ‘-ic’ form, stating that this form was more closely linked to the root meaning of the word because it is a derivative of the noun form, whereas the ‘-ical’ form is more loosely related because it is a derivative of the adjectival form and thus more general. The 18th century linguist James Elphinston argued that the ‘-ic’ form was used more for “solemn” subjects and the ‘-ical’ form, for more “familiar” subjects. This led Marchand to comment that the ‘-ic’ form is more common in science due to its conciseness. That is, “the scholar uses the unextended forms much more, as for him the quality expressed by the adjective is more directly and intimately connected with the thing to which it [the word] is applied than it is for a non-scientist” (as cited in Kaunisto 2007 p.25).

Communicating your experimental findings with others is your most important task as a scientist. You may make critical observations, develop ingenious hypotheses, design innovative experiments, and make important and novel discoveries – but if you cannot communicate your ideas and achievements to your colleagues, your career as a scientist will be at a standstill. 

• Punctuation is important for clarity.
• Clarity is especially important for academic manuscripts.
• Using the Oxford comma increases the clarity of your science manuscript.

As the founding editor of a scientific journal (Behavioral and Neural Biology, now Neurobiology of Learning and Memory) for 25 years and as a reviewer (and author) of scientific articles for over 50 years, I have discovered much about what makes an article excellent, acceptable, or poor. Here are a few of my observations.

A major source of delay in publishing research is submitting your manuscript to the wrong journal. Many strategies can be implemented to optimize the chances of publishing your manuscript. Audience, exposure, focus, language, reputation, and time to print are all critical factors in selecting the journal in which to present your findings.