Acknowledging Science Editors in Manuscript Production

Is It Necessary to Acknowledge Science Editors?

In the intricate realm of scientific manuscript production, the pivotal role executed by science editors often escapes due acknowledgment. Authors frequently grapple with the question of whether it is imperative to recognize the contribution of these editors to their work. The unequivocal response: Affirmative. Expressing acknowledgment of science editors transcends mere courtesy; it emerges as a fundamental tenet of ethical and transparent scientific communication.

Also read: Writing a Concise Science Manuscript in 4 Steps

According to ICMJE:

The guidelines established by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) emphasize the significance of recognizing contributors who fall outside the purview of authorship. Science editors routinely engage in tasks such as writing assistance, technical editing, language editing, and proofreading, all of which significantly contribute to the refinement and lucidity of a manuscript. In the absence of authorship credit, acknowledgment emerges as an indispensable means of ascribing credit conscientiously.

Read: Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors

According to JAMA:

The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) requires that authors acknowledge anyone who made a substantial contribution to the manuscript, but does not qualify as an author.

Read: Authorship and Publishing Agreement

According to AMWA:

The American Medical Writers Association (AMWA) further underscores the necessity for acknowledgment in its position statement on the contributions of medical writers to scientific publications. AMWA not only recognizes the pivotal role played by these professionals but also actively encourages authors to formally acknowledge their contributions, thereby fostering transparency and appropriate attribution in the collaborative process of manuscript development.

Read: ICMJE Authorship Guidelines and Acknowledging Non-author Contributions

How Should One Acknowledge Their Science Editor?

How Should One Acknowledge Their Science Editor?

Acknowledging the invaluable support of science editors represents a standard that upholds ethical authorship. The following are recommended avenues to express gratitude judiciously:

In the Manuscript

During the manuscript submission process, consider incorporating an Acknowledgments section. Adhere to the guidelines laid out by ICMJE and AMWA, delineating the specific contributions of the science editor. This may encompass writing assistance, technical editing, language editing, or any other substantive contributions that have enriched the manuscript.

For example:

“The authors extend their gratitude to [Name and Qualifications] for their meticulous language editing and technical support throughout the preparation of this manuscript.”

Communication with the Editor

Upon returning an edited file, take a moment to acknowledge the science editor personally. A succinct email or note expressing appreciation not only fortifies a positive working relationship but also duly acknowledges the substantial efforts invested.

For example:

“I wish to express my sincere gratitude for your assiduous work on the language editing and technical aspects of my manuscript. Your contributions undeniably elevated the quality of the research.”

Why Acknowledge Science Editors?

Importance of Acknowledging Science Editors:

Fostering Ethical Collaboration

Acknowledging science editors serves as a cornerstone for ethical collaboration and transparent credit attribution. It upholds the precepts of academic integrity, acknowledging the diverse skill set that converges to refine the final manuscript.

Adherence to Professional Standards

Conforming to the guidelines established by respected organizations such as ICMJE and AMWA aligns one’s work with the highest professional standards. This alignment reflects positively on one’s commitment to ethical publication practices, setting a precedent for respectful collaboration within the scientific community.


The act of acknowledging science editors goes beyond the confines of professional courtesy; it manifests as an ethical imperative. Such acknowledgment underscores a commitment to fostering a culture of transparency, integrity, and appreciation for the collaborative effort invested in producing scientific manuscripts of exemplary quality. As we commemorate scientific strides, it is imperative to extend due honor to those instrumental figures working diligently behind the scenes to refine and articulate our collective knowledge.

AI Disclaimer: This article was generated with the assistance of ChatGPT, an AI language model, to enhance its content. The AI-generated content was thoroughly reviewed, rewritten, and edited to ensure accuracy and coherence. The authors take full responsibility for this article.

Want MORE Writing Tips?

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: . You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact

Recent Articles

글쓰기와 관련하여 도움이 필요하십니까?

SciTechEdit는 고객이 수행한 연구의 효과 및 명료성을 강화해 주는 최고 수준의 과학 에디팅 서비스를 제공하기 위해 노력하고 있습니다. 또한 과학계 내에서 이루어지는 효과적인 커뮤니케이션이 갖는 중요성을 이해하고 있으며, SciTechEdit의 숙련된 에디터들이 고객의 과학 원고를 다듬고 향상시킬 수 있도록 도와드립니다.

Need help with writing?

합리적인 가격의 편집을 찾고 계십니까?

  • 경쟁력 있는 가격을 확인하고 연구 수준을 높이세요. 지금 가격 페이지를 방문하세요!